A variety of models for making decisions are available. Three of these models are paternalistic, informative, and shared decision making.
- Discuss the pros and cons of each of these models and the problems that are best suited for the various methods.
- Determine which method has the strongest possibility of resulting in permanent change.
Submission Instructions:
- Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
- You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts
In any situation that requires decision making, there are a variety of models that can be used. Three common models include the paternalistic model, the informative model, and the shared decision-making model. Each model has its pros and cons, and there are certain situations where one model may be more appropriate than another.
The paternalistic model is one where the decision-maker assumes the role of the parent and makes decisions for others without their input. This model is often used in situations where the decision-maker has more knowledge or expertise than the person or people affected by the decision. One advantage of this model is that decisions can be made quickly and efficiently, which can be crucial in situations where time is of the essence. Additionally, individuals who are unable or unwilling to make decisions for themselves may benefit from this model. However, one disadvantage is that the decision-maker may not fully understand the desires or preferences of the person or people affected by the decision, leading to decisions that are not in their best interests.
The informative model, on the other hand, is one where the decision-maker provides information to the person or people affected by the decision and allows them to make the final decision. This model is often used in situations where the decision affects an individual’s personal life or values. One advantage of this model is that it allows individuals to make decisions that align with their personal values and preferences. Additionally, individuals are more likely to be satisfied with the outcome of the decision because they made it themselves. However, one disadvantage is that it can be time-consuming and may not be suitable for situations where time is of the essence.
The shared decision-making model is one where the decision-maker and the person or people affected by the decision work together to come up with a decision that is mutually beneficial. This model is often used in situations where the decision affects a group of people or when there is no clear right or wrong answer. One advantage of this model is that it allows for collaboration and can result in decisions that are more creative and innovative. Additionally, it can promote a sense of ownership and buy-in from all parties involved. However, one disadvantage is that it can be time-consuming and may not be suitable for situations where a quick decision is necessary.
The choice of model depends on the situation. For example, in a medical emergency, the paternalistic model may be the best option, as time is of the essence, and the decision-maker has more knowledge and expertise than the patient. In contrast, in a situation where an individual is deciding on a career path, the informative model may be more appropriate as the individual’s personal values and preferences are crucial to the decision. In situations where multiple parties are affected by a decision, such as in a business or political setting, the shared decision-making model may be the best choice.
In terms of which model has the strongest possibility of resulting in permanent change, it is likely the shared decision-making model. This is because it involves collaboration and buy-in from all parties involved, resulting in a decision that is mutually beneficial. Additionally, because all parties have a stake in the decision, they are more likely to follow through with the decision and work towards its implementation.
In conclusion, there are a variety of models for making decisions, including the paternalistic, informative, and shared decision-making models. Each model has its pros and cons, and the choice of model depends on the situation. While the paternalistic and informative models may be suitable in certain situations, the shared decision-making model has the strongest possibility of resulting in permanent change.