This week, you will complete a literature search, find 10 research articles from peer-reviewed journals and submit an APA annotated bibliography.
Additional details for each project can be viewed in the Course Projects Module
See rubric below for grading detail.
Rubric
NUR445 Week 6 Assignment Grading Rubric
NUR445 Week 6 Assignment Grading Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclusion and exclusion criteria used in the search are discussed
20 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
The annotated bibliography fully describes the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the literature search.
15 to >9.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
The annotated bibliography somewhat describes the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the literature search.
9 to >2.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
The annotated bibliography minimally describes the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the literature search.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
The annotated bibliography does not clearly describe the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the literature search.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppraisal/ analysis of each article includes a description of the research components valuable to the credibility of each study (sample size, validity and reliability of the tool, findings, and other pertinent information)
30 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The annotated bibliography fully appraises/ analyzes each article and includes a description of the research components valuable to the creditability of each study.
22 to >10.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
The annotated bibliography somewhat appraises/ analyzes each article and includes a description of the research components valuable to the creditability of each study. One article may not be appraised OR one of the important components is missing in each appraisal.
10 to >3.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
The annotated bibliography minimally appraises/ analyzes each article and includes a description of the research components valuable to the creditability of each study. One article may not be appraised and/or more than one of the important components is missing in each appraisal
3 to >0 pts
Poor
The annotated bibliography does not clearly appraise/ analyze each article and/ or descriptions of the research components valuable to the creditability of each study are missing.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe conclusion summarizes the main results and findings of the research articles as they pertain to the QIM
30 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The conclusion effectively summarizes the main results and findings of the research articles as they pertain to the QIM.
22 to >10.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
The conclusion somewhat summarizes the main results and findings of the research articles as they pertain to the QIM.
10 to >3.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
The conclusion minimally summarizes the main results and findings of the research articles as they pertain to the QIM.
3 to >0 pts
Poor
The conclusion does not summarize the main results and findings of the research articles as they pertain to the QIM, or the conclusion is missing.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeElements of the Paper
20 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
The overall purpose of the paper is clear; the paper expresses the main idea and major points of the writing prompt. Word choice is consistently concise.
15 to >9.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
The purpose is generally clear; the paper expresses the main idea and most major points of the writing prompt. Word choice is fairly concise.
9 to >2.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
The purpose is unclear. The paper does not accurately express the main idea or most major points of the writing prompt. Word choice is vague or repetitive.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
The purpose is unclear. The paper does not convey the main idea or major points of the writing prompt. Word choice is confusing or misleading. OR assignment was not submitted.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Grammar
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
No errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, or spelling.
9 to >5.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
Minor errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling that interfere with reading/ understanding.
5 to >2.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
Some errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling that interfere with reading/ understanding.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Numerous errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling that interfere with reading/ understanding.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
No errors in APA format, in- text citation(s), or reference page.
9 to >6.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
Minor errors in APA format, in- text citation(s), or reference page.
6 to >2.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
Some errors in APA format, in- text citation(s), or reference page.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Numerous errors in APA format, in-text citation(s), or reference page.
10 pts
Total Points: 120