Reducing Malnutrition Among Veteran

  1. Discuss community conceptualizations as they related to program evaluation– include: community as client, community as relational experience, and community as resource
  2. Pick one of the concepts and define the goal objective standards and measures as it relates to your program.
  3. What insight would you give your peers as you have considered measures of program effectiveness?

My Program is Reducing Malnutrition Among Veteran within the Central VA system.

Reducing Malnutrition Among Veteran

Community Conceptualizations in Program Evaluation

When evaluating a program aimed at reducing malnutrition among veterans within the Central VA system, the concept of community plays a crucial role. Program evaluation can frame the community in three distinct ways: as a client, as a relational experience, and as a resource.

  1. Community as Client: In this view, the community (in this case, the veterans within the Central VA system) is seen as the direct beneficiary of the program. The program is designed to meet the specific needs of this population. Evaluation focuses on assessing whether the program is effectively addressing the malnutrition issues that veterans face, such as improving nutritional intake, access to food, and education around healthy eating habits.
  2. Community as Relational Experience: This perspective highlights the community as a web of relationships. Veterans are not viewed as isolated individuals but as part of a broader system that includes their families, healthcare providers, and support networks. Program evaluation considers how the program enhances these relationships to support better health outcomes. For example, evaluating whether the program encourages collaboration between veterans, dietitians, and social workers.
  3. Community as Resource: Here, the community is viewed as an asset, leveraging its strengths to support program goals. Veterans may have unique knowledge, experiences, and skills that can be harnessed to improve the program’s effectiveness. Evaluation from this perspective examines how well the program utilizes community assets, such as veteran peer support networks or partnerships with local organizations to provide nutritious meals.

Defining Goals, Objectives, Standards, and Measures: Community as Client

Let’s focus on the community as client concept to outline the goals, objectives, standards, and measures for your program to reduce malnutrition among veterans.

  1. Goal:
    To reduce the prevalence of malnutrition among veterans in the Central VA system.
  2. Objectives:
    • Increase the nutritional awareness of veterans by 25% over the next 12 months.
    • Ensure that 90% of veterans accessing the VA system receive nutritional assessments during their routine visits.
    • Improve access to healthy food options for 50% of veterans enrolled in the program within 6 months.
  3. Standards:
    • Every veteran should have a nutritional assessment conducted at least once annually.
    • All veterans identified as malnourished or at risk should receive individualized nutritional plans developed by a registered dietitian within one month of diagnosis.
    • Veterans should have access to VA-supported food assistance programs or referrals to community food resources.
  4. Measures:
    • Process Measures: Track the number of veterans who receive a nutritional assessment and the proportion of those identified as malnourished who are referred to a dietitian.
    • Outcome Measures: Measure the change in the veterans’ nutritional status (e.g., body mass index, dietary intake) over a set period (6-12 months) using baseline and follow-up assessments.
    • Satisfaction Measures: Collect feedback from veterans regarding their satisfaction with the nutritional services provided and access to food resources.

Insights on Program Effectiveness

As you consider program evaluation, it’s important to focus on both quantitative and qualitative measures. For instance, quantitative data such as the number of veterans who have improved their nutritional intake is essential, but equally important is collecting qualitative feedback from veterans on their experiences with the program. This can provide deeper insights into barriers they face and whether the program is addressing their needs in a meaningful way.

Also, involve stakeholders early in the process, especially veterans, to ensure the program aligns with their values and needs. Lastly, be flexible in adjusting the program based on ongoing feedback and outcomes, recognizing that continuous improvement is key to long-term success.

Scroll to Top