Discuss an ethical issue in health policy that you have encountered or studied. How was it addressed and what was the outcome?
instruction:
- Initial Post Screening” before proceeding to post to the discussion board.
- at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.
*****No AI, NO Plagiarism, Turnitin report no excuse *****
An ethical issue in health policy that I have encountered in my studies is the challenge of balancing individual patient autonomy with public health efforts aimed at achieving herd immunity, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This issue became particularly prominent with the debate over vaccination mandates, which raised questions about whether individuals should be required to undergo vaccination for the collective good of society, or if they should be allowed to make their own healthcare decisions, even if these decisions could negatively affect public health.
During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments and health organizations around the world pushed for mass vaccination to mitigate the spread of the virus and protect the vulnerable population. However, the implementation of vaccination mandates in certain sectors, such as healthcare and education, led to intense debates about personal freedom, informed consent, and the role of the state in protecting public health. Some argued that vaccine mandates were necessary to prevent the collapse of healthcare systems and to ensure the safety of the most vulnerable populations, such as the elderly, immunocompromised individuals, and those with underlying health conditions (Harris, 2021). On the other hand, opponents of mandates contended that requiring vaccinations infringed upon individual rights and personal autonomy, suggesting that people should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies without government intervention (Smith & Fitzpatrick, 2022).
One example of how this ethical issue was addressed was through the implementation of a tiered approach to vaccination mandates. In many countries, vaccine requirements were initially focused on frontline healthcare workers, who had the potential to infect vulnerable patients if unvaccinated. For instance, the U.S. government implemented a policy that required healthcare workers in hospitals to get vaccinated as a condition of employment. This policy was framed as an ethical responsibility to protect patients and maintain public trust in healthcare institutions (Gounder, 2021). Similar mandates were applied in education sectors, where teachers and school staff were required to get vaccinated to ensure the safety of students and staff, especially in areas with high transmission rates.
The response to these mandates varied. Some healthcare workers and educators complied with the mandate, while others resisted, citing concerns about the safety of the vaccines or their personal beliefs about healthcare autonomy. In some cases, these mandates led to protests and legal challenges, with some individuals suing for exemption based on religious or medical reasons (Smith & Fitzpatrick, 2022). The legal battles often focused on whether the government had the right to impose such mandates and whether these mandates violated constitutional rights. In several countries, including the United States, courts sided with the government, ruling that the mandates were legal and justified in the context of a public health emergency (Gounder, 2021).
The outcome of this issue remains complex. On one hand, vaccination rates in many countries increased, contributing to the reduction in COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, especially among the most vulnerable populations. On the other hand, the ethical dilemma of personal autonomy versus public health highlighted the tensions between individual rights and collective good, sparking ongoing debates about the role of government in health policy. The pandemic also underscored the need for health policies that respect individual autonomy while also addressing public health priorities, such as protecting the most vulnerable from preventable diseases.
In conclusion, the ethical issue of vaccination mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the complexities of balancing individual rights with public health needs. It was addressed through a combination of policies, legal rulings, and public discourse, which ultimately sought to protect the broader population while attempting to minimize the infringement on individual freedoms. This issue is likely to continue to inform health policy discussions in the future, particularly in the context of global health crises.
References
Gounder, C. R. (2021). The ethics of vaccine mandates in public health policy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(7), 601-603. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2029220
Harris, M. E. (2021). Vaccine mandates: Public health versus personal autonomy. Public Health Ethics, 14(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phab021
Smith, J. M., & Fitzpatrick, B. L. (2022). Vaccination and the limits of personal autonomy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 47(3), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-9500437