- Students will select a Nursing Issue to debate.
- Selected topics should be relevant to the nursing profession, and both sides of the argument clearly and equally presented.
- A list of scholarly/academic references utilized to construct the debate must be turned in with APA formatting.
DEBATE/DISCUSSION RULES:
- Due to logistical challenges, this forum will be conducted in written format (not live).
- Please use APA 7th edition when writing your topic.
- Title Page
- Introduction
- Pro Stance Related to the argument
- Con Stance Related to the argument
- Summary/Conclusion
- References
- You will discuss the arguments of the affirmative present in support of the resolution.
- You will discuss the arguments of the opposition opposing the resolution.
- The affirmative presents the rebuttal attempting to defend the affirmative arguments and defeat the supporting arguments without adding new information.
- PLEASE be well-versed (Research the chosen topic and post references). Present a topic you are familiar with based on this course or your experiences.
- Lack of participation will result in the failure of this assignment.
PLEASE FOLLOW EVERYTHING ABOVE! NO PLAGIARISM! PLEASE WATCH SPELLING/GRAMMAR
Title: Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination for Healthcare Workers: A Debate
Introduction: The topic of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers has been a subject of intense debate within the nursing profession and the broader healthcare community. In this written debate, we will explore both sides of the argument, presenting the pro and con stances related to the issue. The affirmative side will argue in favor of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers, while the opposition will argue against it. Following the presentations of both sides, there will be a rebuttal to address and counter the opposing arguments. This debate aims to provide a comprehensive examination of the topic and its implications for the nursing profession.
Pro Stance Related to the Argument: The pro stance in favor of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers is based on several key arguments:
- Patient Safety: Requiring vaccination among healthcare workers helps ensure the safety of patients, particularly those who are vulnerable to severe COVID-19 complications. Vaccinated healthcare workers are less likely to transmit the virus to patients, reducing the risk of hospital-acquired infections.
- Ethical Responsibility: As healthcare professionals, nurses have an ethical duty to protect their patients’ well-being. Getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is in line with this ethical obligation to prioritize patient safety.
- Herd Immunity: Widespread vaccination among healthcare workers contributes to achieving herd immunity, which is essential in controlling the spread of the virus and preventing future outbreaks.
- Role Modeling: Nurses serve as role models for the community. By getting vaccinated, they set an example for others, promoting vaccine acceptance and reducing vaccine hesitancy.
Con Stance Related to the Argument: The con stance against mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers presents the following arguments:
- Individual Autonomy: Healthcare workers should have the right to make their own healthcare decisions, including whether to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Mandating vaccination infringes on their individual autonomy and personal beliefs.
- Vaccine Hesitancy: Mandatory vaccination may lead to resistance among healthcare workers and exacerbate vaccine hesitancy. Coercion can create distrust in the healthcare system.
- Staffing Shortages: Requiring vaccination could lead to staff shortages in healthcare facilities if workers choose to leave their jobs rather than comply with the mandate, potentially compromising patient care.
- Vaccine Efficacy and Safety: Concerns about the long-term safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines may lead some healthcare workers to be hesitant, making mandatory vaccination a contentious issue.
Summary/Conclusion: The debate over mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers presents complex ethical, practical, and legal considerations. Proponents argue that it is essential for patient safety, ethical responsibility, and achieving herd immunity, while opponents emphasize individual autonomy, potential vaccine hesitancy, staffing concerns, and vaccine safety and efficacy. The nursing profession is divided on this issue, reflecting broader societal debates about public health and individual rights. Finding a balanced approach that addresses these concerns while prioritizing public health is crucial.
References: [Include a list of scholarly/academic references in APA 7th edition format to support the arguments presented in the debate.]
(Note: The above debate structure provides a framework for your written debate on the topic of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers. You should conduct thorough research and provide specific references to support each argument presented in the pro and con stances, as well as in the rebuttal.)