Medical App - Nursing Depo

Medical App for Assignment
	MDCalc

For the above App answer the following:

NAME: What is the name of the app?
AUTHOR:Who created, developed, or maintains the app? Explain.
ENDORSEMENT:Is the app licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, other government agency, or endorsed by an academic institution or medical professional organization? Explain.
OPERATION:Which platform (mobile or web-based) is suitable for the app and why?
AESTHETICS:Is the information displayed in a way that is easy to navigate? Is it easy to use? Can you use it without instructions? Explain.
PURPOSE:What is the intended purpose or use of the app?
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING:What influence does the app have on clinical decision making? Explain.
SAFETY:Is there potential for patient harm? Explain.
PRIVACY/SECURITY:Does the app have privacy statement or setting? Is there a clear privacy policy stating information will be encrypted and not shared with third parties? Does the app share information on social networks? Are users notified in the event of a breach of privacy and health information? Explain.
USER:For whom is the app intended (providers, patients, or others)? Explain.
DISTRIBUTION:Is it designed for local use or wider distribution? Explain.
CREDIBILITY: How credible are the sources of information? How do you know? Explain.
RELEVANCE:How current is the information in the app? When was the last update? Is the content consistent with evidence-based literature or best practices/standards of care? Explain.

PART 3:Provide one example of an appropriate patient or clinical scenario for this app. The example should include the following details:

Patient Age-population (Pediatric, Adult, Geriatric)
Clinical Setting (Hospital, Private Practice, Extended Living Facility)
History of Present Illness and Diagnosis or Condition
Provide a detailed description of the app in your example. When will the app be implemented (at the Point-of-care or elsewhere)? Who will use the app? What potential impact will it have on the scenario? Incorporate the critical appraisal information from Part 2. Provide one evidence-based scholarly article as a reference to support clinical decision-making.

This assignment will be graded on the quality of the information, inclusion of one evidence-based scholarly resource, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, and organization based on the required components (see the paper headings and content details in Part 1).
5. The length of the paper is to be between 1,000 and 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.
6. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”
7. APA format is required in this assignment, explicitly for in-text citations and the reference list. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins and double spacing. See the APA manual for details regarding proper citation. See resources under Course Resources, “Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers” for further clarification.

* Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal.  You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article.  The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs.  These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality.  For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality.  It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site.  Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years.  Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Part 1: App Information

Name of the App: MDCalc
Author and Maintenance: MDCalc was developed by a team of medical professionals, including physicians and researchers. It is maintained by a group of healthcare experts who ensure the app’s accuracy and relevance.
Endorsement: While MDCalc is not directly endorsed by a government agency, it is widely recognized and used by medical professionals, institutions, and organizations. It has gained credibility over time due to its evidence-based content.
Platform Suitability: MDCalc is available as a mobile app and a web-based platform. Both platforms are suitable for the app because they provide easy access to medical calculations and guidelines, which can be essential at the point of care or in various clinical settings.
Aesthetics and Usability: MDCalc’s user interface is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly. The information is displayed in a clear and organized manner, making it easy to navigate. Most healthcare professionals can use the app without specific instructions.
Purpose: The intended purpose of MDCalc is to provide medical professionals, including physicians, nurses, and other healthcare practitioners, with a comprehensive collection of medical calculators and clinical decision support tools. It aids in making accurate medical calculations, risk assessments, and treatment recommendations based on evidence-based guidelines.
Influence on Clinical Decision Making: MDCalc significantly influences clinical decision making by providing accurate and up-to-date information for medical calculations and assessments. It helps healthcare providers make informed decisions regarding diagnostic and treatment strategies.
Safety: MDCalc’s primary function is to provide medical calculations and decision support. While it doesn’t directly administer treatments or interventions, there is minimal potential for patient harm if the user inputs incorrect data. However, the app includes warnings and disclaimers to guide users in proper usage.
Privacy/Security: MDCalc is committed to user privacy and security. It has a clear privacy policy that ensures user information is encrypted and not shared with third parties. The app does not share information on social networks. Users are notified in the event of any breach of privacy or health information.
User: The app is intended for healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, and other clinical staff. It serves as a valuable tool in various healthcare settings, such as hospitals, clinics, and private practices.
Distribution: MDCalc is designed for wider distribution, allowing medical professionals around the world to access its resources and tools.
Credibility: The sources of information in MDCalc are highly credible, as they are derived from evidence-based medical literature, clinical guidelines, and expert consensus. The app’s reputation and widespread use within the medical community contribute to its credibility.
Relevance: MDCalc’s information is regularly updated to align with current evidence-based literature and best practices. The app’s content is consistent with established standards of care, making it a reliable resource for clinical decision making.

Part 2: Example Scenario Patient Age-population: Adult

Clinical Setting: Hospital Emergency Department

History of Present Illness and Diagnosis: A 45-year-old male patient presents to the emergency department with acute chest pain and shortness of breath. Initial assessment indicates a possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

App Description and Implementation: In this scenario, the MDCalc app is implemented at the point of care within the hospital’s emergency department. The attending physician uses the app to calculate the patient’s TIMI Score and GRACE Score to assess the risk of adverse cardiac events and determine appropriate management strategies. The app provides instant calculations and interprets the results based on evidence-based guidelines.

App User and Impact: The attending physician uses the MDCalc app to guide the clinical decision-making process. The app aids in risk stratification, allowing the physician to make informed decisions regarding further diagnostic tests, interventions, and potential admission to the cardiac care unit. By using the app, the physician can quickly and accurately assess the patient’s risk profile and tailor the treatment plan accordingly.

Evidence-Based Scholarly Article: [Provide a relevant evidence-based scholarly article related to the use of medical calculators and clinical decision support tools in acute coronary syndrome management.]

(Note: You’ll need to find and cite an actual scholarly article that supports the use of medical calculators in acute coronary syndrome management. Make sure the article is within the last 5 years to meet the scholarly source requirement.)

Part 3: Paper Length and Format Your paper should be between 1,000 and 1,500 words, excluding the title page and reference list. Use Microsoft Word and follow APA format guidelines for in-text citations and the reference list. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins and double spacing.

Please note that I’ve provided a general outline and example for your assignment. You will need to conduct research to find a relevant scholarly article, gather additional details about the MDCalc app, and expand upon the provided information to meet the word count requirement. Make sure to follow the assignment instructions and guidelines for citation and formatting.