Middle Range Theories

Making judgement as to whether a theory could be adapted for use in research is very important.  Describe the internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate middle range theories.

middle range theories

Middle-range theories are theories that explain specific phenomena within a particular discipline or field of study. When evaluating whether a middle-range theory is appropriate for use in research, both internal and external criticisms are used.

Internal criticism refers to an examination of the theory itself and its internal consistency. Some questions that may be asked during internal criticism include:

  1. Is the theory logically consistent?
  2. Are the concepts and relationships among them clearly defined and adequately supported?
  3. Are the assumptions made by the theory justified?
  4. Does the theory have explanatory power?

External criticism, on the other hand, refers to an evaluation of the theory in light of other theories or evidence. Some questions that may be asked during external criticism include:

  1. Is the theory supported by empirical evidence?
  2. Does the theory fit with other theories in the same field?
  3. Is the theory applicable to other contexts or fields?
  4. Are there any limitations or weaknesses in the theory that may affect its applicability?

By using both internal and external criticism, researchers can determine whether a middle-range theory is appropriate for use in their research and whether it is likely to generate meaningful results.

Middle-range theories are theories that explain specific phenomena within a particular discipline or field of study. When evaluating whether a middle-range theory is appropriate for use in research, both internal and external criticisms are used.

Internal criticism refers to an examination of the theory itself and its internal consistency. Some questions that may be asked during internal criticism include:

  1. Is the theory logically consistent?
  2. Are the concepts and relationships among them clearly defined and adequately supported?
  3. Are the assumptions made by the theory justified?
  4. Does the theory have explanatory power?

External criticism, on the other hand, refers to an evaluation of the theory in light of other theories or evidence. Some questions that may be asked during external criticism include:

  1. Is the theory supported by empirical evidence?
  2. Does the theory fit with other theories in the same field?
  3. Is the theory applicable to other contexts or fields?
  4. Are there any limitations or weaknesses in the theory that may affect its applicability?

By using both internal and external criticism, researchers can determine whether a middle-range theory is appropriate for use in their research and whether it is likely to generate meaningful results.

Scroll to Top