Search Engine to Identify Articles for Article Summary Assignments

/ Blogs / By

What search engines or databases are you using to identify the articles for your Article Summary assignments?

What keywords are you using for your search?

Have they been effective in finding articles that are relevant to your clinical practice? Include rationale.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources
  • ** NO AI, NO Plagiarism, Turnitin report

search engine to identify articles for Article Summary assignments

Identifying Search Engines and Databases for Article Summary Assignments

When searching for articles for my Article Summary assignments, I primarily utilize several trusted databases and search engines designed to provide evidence-based, peer-reviewed, and clinically relevant resources. The databases I rely on most are PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane Library. Additionally, I use Google Scholar for supplementary articles and UpToDate for clinical guidelines and best practices. These resources are particularly suited for healthcare professionals, as they are comprehensive and focus on high-quality scholarly materials.

PubMed is a free database maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), containing millions of citations from MEDLINE, life sciences journals, and books. It offers tools like Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), which I often use to refine my search. CINAHL, on the other hand, focuses on nursing and allied health literature, making it ideal for my clinical practice as a nursing student. Cochrane Library is unparalleled for systematic reviews, which provide a robust synthesis of existing evidence. These databases provide credible, peer-reviewed information crucial for academic writing and clinical decision-making.

Keywords and Search Strategies

To effectively locate relevant articles, I use a combination of keywords, Boolean operators, and MeSH terms tailored to the specific topic. For instance, if I am researching the management of depression in primary care, my keywords might include:

  • “Depression AND primary care”
  • “Management of depression AND evidence-based”
  • “Antidepressants OR psychotherapy”

I also incorporate population-specific terms, such as “adults,” “pediatrics,” or “elderly,” to narrow my results. Using Boolean operators such as “AND,” “OR,” and “NOT” allows me to combine or exclude terms to refine my search results. For example, “Depression AND pharmacological treatment NOT adolescents” eliminates irrelevant articles.

In databases like PubMed, MeSH terms such as “Mental Health,” “Cognitive Behavioral Therapy,” or “Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs)” further refine searches by categorizing articles under specific headings.

Additionally, I use filters such as publication date (e.g., articles published within the last 5 years), study type (e.g., randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews), and language (English).

Effectiveness and Relevance to Clinical Practice

These search methods have been effective in identifying articles relevant to my clinical practice. For instance, using a combination of “diabetes management” and “nutrition intervention” yielded multiple articles that directly informed a patient education project on diabetes care. Similarly, when exploring the impact of telehealth on rural mental health services, I used “telehealth AND rural healthcare” to identify articles that addressed the barriers and facilitators to access.

The rationale for my satisfaction with these databases and strategies is twofold:

  1. Credibility and Relevance: Databases like PubMed and CINAHL ensure that the articles are peer-reviewed, evidence-based, and clinically applicable, which is critical for advancing practice and patient care.
  2. Efficiency: By using specific keywords and search filters, I save time and avoid irrelevant or low-quality articles. This efficiency is particularly valuable in balancing academic requirements with clinical responsibilities.

Limitations and Future Adjustments

While my strategies are generally effective, challenges do arise. For example, some searches yield an overwhelming number of results, requiring further refinement. In such cases, I use more specific keywords or apply additional filters. Additionally, access to full-text articles can sometimes be restricted. To address this, I utilize my institution’s library services or interlibrary loan options.

In conclusion, the search engines and databases I use, combined with effective keyword strategies, have been instrumental in finding relevant articles that directly inform my clinical practice. As I continue my studies, I plan to explore other resources, such as Scopus and EMBASE, to broaden my access to literature and further enhance the quality of my assignments and clinical decisions.

References

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top