Using the theory of unpleasant symptoms as a guide, what would you look for in an assessment tool for patient symptoms?
include 400 words in your initial post with two scholarly articles
References in APA format. Turnitin 30% Max
Using the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms to Guide Symptom Assessment
The Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms (TOUS) provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating patient symptoms by considering their multidimensional nature. TOUS posits that symptoms are influenced by physiological, psychological, and situational factors, which impact their intensity, distress, and performance outcomes (Lenz et al., 1997). When selecting an assessment tool to evaluate patient symptoms, several key factors must be considered to align with TOUS principles.
Key Considerations in Symptom Assessment Tools
-
Multidimensional Symptom Evaluation
TOUS emphasizes that symptoms are complex and influenced by multiple factors. An effective assessment tool should capture symptom intensity, distress, and functional impact. For example, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) evaluates the severity of multiple symptoms, including pain, fatigue, nausea, and depression, on a numerical scale (Hui & Bruera, 2017). Such tools provide a holistic view of the patient’s symptom experience. -
Influencing Factors and Context
TOUS highlights physiological, psychological, and situational factors that shape symptoms. A robust tool should include questions on medical history, mental health status, social support, and environmental stressors. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) incorporates these aspects, making it a valuable tool for symptom assessment (Cella et al., 2010). -
Patient-Centered and Subjective Reporting
Since symptom perception varies among individuals, an effective tool must prioritize patient self-reporting. The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) allows patients to describe pain quality, intensity, and emotional impact, aligning with TOUS’s recognition of subjective symptom experiences (Melzack, 2005). -
Ability to Track Symptom Progression
TOUS considers symptom trajectories over time. An ideal tool should support longitudinal tracking to monitor symptom changes and treatment effectiveness. Digital health tools, such as electronic symptom diaries, enhance real-time symptom tracking and personalized interventions.
In conclusion, TOUS emphasizes a holistic approach to symptom assessment, necessitating tools that capture multiple symptom dimensions, influencing factors, subjective patient experiences, and longitudinal trends. Instruments like ESAS, PROMIS, and MPQ align well with this theoretical model, improving symptom evaluation and management.
References
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., … & Rose, M. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c1f2ea
Hui, D., & Bruera, E. (2017). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: A decade of research: 1991-2001. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 4(3), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2001.4.321
Lenz, E. R., Pugh, L. C., Milligan, R. A., Gift, A., & Suppe, F. (1997). The middle-range theory of unpleasant symptoms: An update. Advances in Nursing Science, 19(3), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199703000-00004
Melzack, R. (2005). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: From description to measurement. Anesthesiology, 103(1), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200507000-00032