Understanding of “Translation Science”

/ Samples / By
  • Review the Learning Resources below. Pay particular attention to the featured frameworks/models, below, in the White, Dudley-Brown, and Terhaar text.
  • Identify the translation science framework or model that is most relevant to your practice problem from among the following three models and consider your reasoning:
    • Roger’s Diffusion of Innovations (pp. 36–39);
    • Knowledge-to-Action (pp. 42–45);
    • Theory of Reasoned Action (pp. 66–67).
  • Assess your understanding of “translation science” and how you would explain it in the context of evidence-based practice and quality improvement.

With these thoughts in mind …

Post an explanation of the translation science framework or model that you selected and explain why it is most relevant to your practice problem. Be specific and provide examples and at least 3 references
learning resources:

  • White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2019). Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer.
    • Chapter 2, “The Science of Translation and Major Frameworks” (pp. 27–58)
      (Review from Week 4)
    • Chapter 3, “Change Theory and Models: Framework for Translation” (pp. 59–73)
  • Boehm, L. M., Stolldorf, D. P., & Jeffery, A. D. (2020). Implementation science training and resources for nurses and nurse scientistsLinks to an external site.. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12510

understanding of “translation science”

In the context of evidence-based practice and quality improvement, the most relevant translation science framework/model among the three options provided (Roger’s Diffusion of Innovations, Knowledge-to-Action, and Theory of Reasoned Action) is the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) framework. Here’s an explanation of the KTA framework and why it is the most relevant to the practice problem:

Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Framework: The Knowledge-to-Action framework, as outlined by Graham et al. (2006) and discussed in the White, Dudley-Brown, and Terhaar text, is a comprehensive model designed to facilitate the translation of research knowledge into clinical practice and policy decisions. It is particularly well-suited for addressing practice problems within healthcare settings, as it provides a systematic approach to identify, assess, adapt, and apply evidence into practice.

The KTA framework consists of two main phases:

  1. Knowledge Creation and Action Cycle:
    • Knowledge Creation: This phase involves generating new research evidence, which can be based on systematic reviews, clinical trials, or other research methodologies. It also encompasses the synthesis of existing knowledge.
    • Action Cycle: After knowledge creation, the framework emphasizes the importance of an iterative action cycle, involving the following key steps:
      • Problem Identification and Knowledge Inquiry: Identifying the specific practice problem and the relevant evidence.
      • Knowledge Synthesis: Synthesizing and adapting research knowledge to the local context.
      • Stakeholder Engagement: Involving key stakeholders such as healthcare practitioners, policymakers, and patients in decision-making and implementation.
      • Tailoring Knowledge to the Local Context: Adapting evidence to the specific needs and constraints of the healthcare setting.
      • Implementation: Putting evidence-based practices into action.
      • Monitoring and Evaluation: Continuously assessing the impact of implemented changes and making necessary adjustments.

Why the KTA Framework is Relevant: The KTA framework is highly relevant to evidence-based practice and quality improvement in healthcare for several reasons:

  1. Systematic Approach: It offers a systematic and practical approach to bridging the gap between research evidence and clinical practice. This aligns with the core principles of evidence-based practice.
  2. Stakeholder Engagement: The framework emphasizes the importance of engaging key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and patients, which is crucial for the successful implementation of evidence-based interventions.
  3. Flexibility: The KTA framework recognizes that one size does not fit all in healthcare. It allows for the adaptation of research knowledge to the local context, considering the unique challenges and resources of a particular healthcare setting.
  4. Continuous Improvement: The iterative action cycle ensures that the translation process is ongoing, and healthcare practices can be continuously improved based on the latest evidence and feedback.
  5. Monitoring and Evaluation: It places a strong emphasis on monitoring and evaluating the outcomes of implemented changes, which is essential for quality improvement efforts.

In summary, the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) framework is highly relevant to the practice problem in healthcare settings as it provides a structured and adaptable approach to translating evidence into practice while involving key stakeholders and ensuring continuous improvement. This framework aligns well with the principles of evidence-based practice and quality improvement in nursing and healthcare.

Scroll to Top